Star Trek Beyond 3D  

 

 

“Almost Perfection”

 I am a Sci-Fi fan and the Star Trek movies are some of my favourite movies. I love the characters and the cast and I am looking forward to seeing the next issue in the franchise.

This is the first movie that JJ Abrams isn’t directing and instead Justin Lim has taken over the reins. Abrams has stayed on as a producer but I admit I had a couple of worries about changing to a different director in a trilogy. Lim we know from the Fast and the Furious franchise so he understands about the character development throughout a franchise and is a big fan of Star Trek so I think it was a great decision to bring him on.

In an interview from 19th July 2016 with Hey U Guys Lin said “Star Trek should be equally compelling in a space war as it should be in two characters talking, it has limitless opportunities.” Unfortuately only a month before this interview was conducted Anton Yelchin (Checkov) was involved in a freak accident which led to his death. (Lin, 2016)

At the time of his death Yelchin had finished his scenes but the film was still in production and editing. Chris Pine said on Good Morning America “Our group if anything is a group of friends and family and it was nice to have them around to process what happened and pay tribute to who Anton was and to remember him and his smile and ride the waves of grief together.” I think this is a beautiful sentiment and shows how they have become so close during the filming of these three films.  (Pine, 2016)

As well as Yelchin’s tragic passing the cast and crew were also mourning the loss of Leonard Nimoy who played the original Spock, who passed away in February 2015. They were able to pay tribute to them both in a meaningful way. In the script Spock gets the news that older ambassador Spock Prime has passed away. Whilst going through his things Spock discovers an old photo of the original cast from the tv show. This memorialised the 50 year anniversary of Star Trek as well as one of its Stars. Quinto said “I feel like it was very important for me to find a way to include him in this film. And I thought that Simon Pegg and Doug Jung, our writers, did a beautiful job of really weaving him into the narrative, and not having it be a fleeting acknowledgement…”. (Oldies, 2016)

At the end of the movie they are toasting to “The enterprise, to absent friends”, at this point the camera lingers over Chekov and at the end of the credits it says “In memory of Leonard Nimoy” and “For Anton”. A touching sentiment.

Another issue that they faced during production was the choice to make Sulu gay as an homage to George Takei. I (as well as the World) were worried about how they would handle this and bring this into the story as it is a touchy subject nowadays. I think the way they did it was beautiful. Simple and beautiful. Sulu ran up to his daughter when they are at Yorktown and then it is revealed he has a husband who simply puts his arm around him as they walk away together. According to John Cho there was a kissing scene that was edited out. I think that not having the kissing scene was a good move as you can just feel the emotion without it being too in your face. I loved it. (Edwards, 2016)

This was not all doom and gloom and in fact is a very funny film. Simon Pegg joined the writers and I believe gave us some great quotes.

Spock: Fear of death is illogical.

Bones: Fear of death is what keeps us alive.

 

Kirk: Better to die saving lives than killing them.

 

Jaylah: Engineering.

Scotty: Aye, that’s right. I fix things. (Lin, Star Trek Beyond, 2016)

As much as I loved the film it wasn’t perfect. I noticed a couple of errors. The one that bugged me the most was when the crew are escaping the Enterprise in the Kelvin pods. When they get out of the pods suddenly Chekov and Kirk have changed clothes.

BEFORE:

ST Before

AFTER:

ST After

Another continuity problem I discovered was with Kalara. She obviously does not speak English and she is speaking using the Universal Translator. This automatically turns whatever she was saying into English BUT we always hear her speak in her alien language before the English kicks in. Sometimes this doesn’t always happen. Although this isn’t a big issue I just found that this took me out of the film a bit, which was a shame as I felt so enveloped in the film.

As per usual you know my issues with 3D films but when it comes to Sci-Fi and Space it is amazing. With the 3D it was visually spectacular, I can’t help but have a huge smile on my face. 4 stars.

film-reelfilm-reelfilm-reelfilm-reelfilm-reel Outline

RIP Anton and Leonard ❤ Live Long And Prosper

Live Long ST

Director: Justin Lim

Cast: Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Anton Yelchin, Zoe Saldana, Keith Urban, Simon Pegg, John Cho,

Crew:  JJ Abrams (Producer)

Genre: Sci-Fi Action

Rating: 12A

Works Cited

Edwards, V. (2016, July 23). Star Trek could have ‘boldly gone’ even further: Actor John Cho reveals that a kiss between the new film’s openly gay Sulu and his partner was edited out. Retrieved from Daily Mail: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3704889/Star-Trek-boldly-gone-New-film-omitted-sex-kissing-scene-featured-sci-fi-franchise-s-openly-gay-character-Sulu.html

Lin, J. (2016, July 19). Director Justin Lin Exclusive Interview – Star Trek Beyond. (HeyUGuys, Interviewer)

Lin, J. (Director). (2016). Star Trek Beyond [Motion Picture].

Oldies, C. H. (2016, July 25). “Star Trek Beyond’s” Zachary Quinto Remembers Leonard Nimoy, Anton Yelchin. Retrieved from Classic Hits and Oldies: http://www.classichitsandoldies.com/v2/74423/

Pine, C. (2016, July 19). Chris Pine Interview on ‘STAR TREK BEYOND’ & Anton Yelchin | Good Morning America. (G. M. America, Interviewer)

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2016/07/19/star-trek-beyond-cast-talks-anton-yelchins-death-it-will-never-stop-being-terrible.html

http://www.etonline.com/news/193383_exclusive_star_trek_beyond_cast_members_remember_anton_yelchin_ahead_of_film_release/

http://gb.imdb.com/title/tt2660888/?ref_=rvi_tt

Live Long And Prosper Car Decal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ghostbusters 3D

“Scarily Simple”

I am going to be honest I HATE REBOOTS AND REMAKES. I believe that once a movie has been made it should be left alone. I even don’t understand when they do shot for shot remakes of a foreign film (*Cough* REC and Quarantine) just read the subtitles people!

So I guess my point is that I am a traditionalist, but I always try and keep an open mind.  The original Ghostbusters from 1984 I am a big fan. I love the quirkiness and the actor’s portrayals of the characters, and I guess that’s where I came into my first problem with the reboot. Gender swapping.

To me I don’t find that it adds anything to the film it seems more of a gimmick. Don’t get me wrong I love female led movies and everything. For instance back in 2010 Angelina Jolie took the role in Salt which was originally attached to Tom Cruise. (Zeitchik, 2010) This was a great decision and Jolie was amazing in the role. But we didn’t already have the image of the character in our heads until we saw the film. I don’t see the need to do the gender swap in this instance though.

I am a fan of the actresses (Wiig, McCarthy, McKinnon and Jones) but I don’t know I just didn’t connect to them. They were trying too hard to be funny in my opinion and I don’t think it was their best performances. When I think of the original Ghostbusters one scene that really sticks out for me is when Sigourney Weaver is possessed and you can see a complete change in her character. A similar thing happens to Melissa McCarthy’s character and although there was a slight change it wasn’t as defined as Weaver’s and don’t even get me started on Chris Hemsworth. He did not change at all! He may look pretty but he is not needed and this annoys be because I love him as Thor but the character of Kevin is below him. The character would fit in to a movie like Hail Caesar! As all the characters are pointless.

The one highlight in the film was the discovery of the logo. Bringing the graffiti on the subway was very clever and makes a lot of sense with the dialogue. I also enjoyed the cameo’s of the original actors. Sigourney Weaver briefly appears as Holtzmann’s mentor Rebecca Gorin. Ernie Hudson, as an undertaker Bill and uncle of Tolan, Bill Murray, as Martin Heiss, accuses the Ghostbusters of being fraudsters. Dan Aykroyd, an all knowing cab driver. Annie Potts appears as a desk clerk, snapping her 1984 line, “What do you want…” (Ghostbusters 2016 , 2016).

At the end of the day I guess for people who don’t know the original they may like it (not many people I admit), but I don’t. I find the whole concept flawed. It is very predictable, over acted and I found myself bored. Stick to the original if you want a real laugh. Also as you may have noticed I hate pointless 3D, and once again this is guilty of it. Occasionally it works for instance with the vomiting scene but apart from that it adds nothing to it.

2 stars.

film-reelfilm-reelfilm-reel Outlinefilm-reel Outlinefilm-reel Outline

Director: Paul Feig

Cast: Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Kate McKinnon, Leslie Jones

Crew:  Ivan Reitman (Producer)

Genre: Supernatural Comedy

Rating: 12A

Works Cited

Ghostbusters 2016 . (2016). Retrieved from IMDB: http://gb.imdb.com/title/tt1289401/trivia?ref_=tt_trv_trv

Zeitchik, S. (2010, July 22). Women’s work: Angelina Jolie steps into a spy’s role originally written for a man in ‘Salt’. Retrieved from Los Angeles Times: http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jul/22/entertainment/la-et-salt-20100722

 

 

 

Now You See Me 2

“Magically Mediocre”

Sequels are a funny thing. They normally all go downhill from the original but I am an optimist when it comes to films. I was a huge fan of Now You See Me (NYSM) as I love magic. It is a personal love of mine as it fascinates me. I really liked the story and the cast and characters so I was really looking forward to seeing the sequel. As soon as I saw they were making a second film I was convinced they should call it “Now You Don’t” the marketing writes itself! Regrettably even a better name couldn’t save this film.

I was bitterly disappointed. It was very drawn out, they tried to up the stakes and everything but I was bored and it didn’t catch my attention. It was very over the top and the storyline kept getting more involved for no real reason. Changing the director gave it a different feel I’m not sure whether it made much of a difference.

*Spoiler Alert*

The one thing that I really liked was the death of Lionel Striker. The idea of it resonated with the true story of Amazing Joe Burrus. On October 31st 1990 this magician tried to do Harry Houdini’s buried alive trick on the anniversary of Houdini’s death. Although Houdini never performed it on stage because he died before hand it is one of his famous tricks mainly due to the fact that it almost killed him during one performance. Burrus said “I consider myself a master of illusion and an escape artist. I believe I am the next Houdini and greater, to me, that is what an escape artist is: to put myself in an impossible situation and get out of it.” (AP, 1990)

Check out the video below, but bare in mind it is not suitable for people of a nervous disposition.

Unfortunately Burrus didn’t make it out alive and now shares something else with Houdini, his death date. Striker’s death in the film reminded me of the ever present danger that magicians face during every trick. I like the reality check.

The main issue I had with the film was the timeline. They said that the events of the first film was a year ago, so because of this I have it in my mind the timeframe. Later in the film Thaddeus says he has been in jail 18 months.  How does that work as he was arrested at the end of the first film? Maybe I am being picky but I am a stickler for these sort of continuity errors.

Another issue I have with any sequel is when they change characters. Isla Fisher had to drop out of the film due to her pregnancy and was replaced with Lizzy Caplan. Caplan did a great job and brought a new energy into the film but even her ever present optimism could not save this film. I mean come on what is with Merritt’s twin Chase? It is way too out of the box and very predictable. Also Daniel Radcliff as the bad guy was more comical that believable. Merritt referring to him as the “man-boy” was on point! (Chu, 2016)

Unfortunately with the world of magic once the trick has been explained then the experience is over. This makes me worry about the fact that they are doing another film and making it a trilogy when it’s not really needed or asked for.

I can only give it 3 stars.

film-reelfilm-reelfilm-reelfilm-reel Outlinefilm-reel Outline

Director: Jon M. Chu

Cast:  Jesse Eisenberg, Mark Ruffalo, Woody Harrelson, Dave Franco, Daniel Radcliffe, Lizzy Caplan

Crew:   Ed Solomon (Screenwriter)

Genre: Thriller Caper

Rating: 12A

Works Cited

  1. (1990, November 1). Man Who Billed Himself As Escape Artist Dies In Halloween Stunt. Retrieved from The Seattle Times: http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19901101&slug=1101736

Chu, J. M. (Director). (2016). Now You See Me 2 [Motion Picture].